↓ Skip to main content

Looking for attitudes related to amphibian species decline: how are peer-reviewed publications of education activities compared to ecological research?

Overview of attention for article published in Anais da Academia Brasileira de Ciências, May 2017
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
2 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
44 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Looking for attitudes related to amphibian species decline: how are peer-reviewed publications of education activities compared to ecological research?
Published in
Anais da Academia Brasileira de Ciências, May 2017
DOI 10.1590/0001-3765201720160463
Pubmed ID
Authors

Roger P Mormul, Tayla D S Mormul, Gustavo M B Santos, Ana R A Santana

Abstract

Biodiversity decline has been the focus of discussions in the last decade, especially on the amphibian species decline. After a scientometric analysis using international databases, we found that the number of peer-reviewed articles considering education practices related to the theme increased along with the number of ecological researches. However, the increase in ecological researches is much higher than the increase in publications of education practices. Studies suggest that conservation attitudes are important and that education practices are an important tool for improving human perceptions on this subject. In this sense, increase the publication of projects and programs results related to local education practices in international journals could help the dissemination of efficient methods for conservation, as well as facilitating access to information internationally, since species decline, especially for amphibians, is a global concern. Then, we suggest that educational practices, at least when related to conservation, should follow a more standardized protocol, and be published in international journals, as the efficiency of such practices should be evaluated and methods once published could help other nations to improve their ecological literacy.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 44 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 44 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 6 14%
Researcher 5 11%
Unspecified 4 9%
Other 3 7%
Professor 3 7%
Other 9 20%
Unknown 14 32%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Environmental Science 7 16%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 7 16%
Unspecified 4 9%
Arts and Humanities 2 5%
Social Sciences 2 5%
Other 7 16%
Unknown 15 34%