↓ Skip to main content

Going Beyond Academic Integrity Might Broaden our Understanding of Plagiarism in Science Education: A Perspective from a Study in Brazil*

Overview of attention for article published in Anais da Academia Brasileira de Ciências, April 2017
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
8 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
80 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Going Beyond Academic Integrity Might Broaden our Understanding of Plagiarism in Science Education: A Perspective from a Study in Brazil*
Published in
Anais da Academia Brasileira de Ciências, April 2017
DOI 10.1590/0001-3765201720160474
Pubmed ID
Authors

Christiane C Santos, Patrícia S Dos Santos, Maurício C Sant'ana, Hatisaburo Masuda, Monica B Barboza, Sonia M R Vasconcelos

Abstract

Fostering innovation and creativity is a priority in the science and education policy agenda of most countries, which have advocated that innovative minds and processes will boost scientific and economic growth. While our knowledge society has embraced this view, fostering creativity is among the major challenges faced by educators and policymakers. For example, plagiarism, which may be considered a form of imitation and repetition, is a global concern at schools and universities. However, most discussions focus on academic integrity, which, we believe, leaves some gaps in the approach to the problem. As part of an ongoing project on plagiarism, science and education policy, we show results from a survey sent to 143 high-school science teachers at one of the most highly regarded federal schools in Brazil. Among respondents (n=42), about 50% admit that students plagiarize in assignments. Additionally, many of these educators suggest that the way biology, chemistry and physics are taught at school stimulates more repetition than creativity. Our findings are consistent with the need for a broader perspective on plagiarism and with initiatives to stimulate creativity and critical thinking among students. Although we offer a perspective from Brazil, it may illuminate current discussions on plagiarism, particularly in emerging countries.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 80 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 80 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 11 14%
Student > Bachelor 9 11%
Other 6 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 6 8%
Lecturer 5 6%
Other 17 21%
Unknown 26 33%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Social Sciences 13 16%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 8 10%
Medicine and Dentistry 7 9%
Engineering 4 5%
Business, Management and Accounting 3 4%
Other 17 21%
Unknown 28 35%