↓ Skip to main content

Palisadegrass effects on N fertilizer dynamic in intercropping systems with corn

Overview of attention for article published in Anais da Academia Brasileira de Ciências, September 2017
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
9 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
19 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Palisadegrass effects on N fertilizer dynamic in intercropping systems with corn
Published in
Anais da Academia Brasileira de Ciências, September 2017
DOI 10.1590/0001-3765201720160811
Pubmed ID
Authors

Rodrigo E M DE Almeida, Silas M DE Oliveira, Bruno C Lago, Clovis P, Paulo C O Trivelin, José L Favarin

Abstract

Corn grain yield, nitrogen (N) fertilizer efficiency and distribution to corn alone and three forms of corn and palisadegrass (Urochloa spp.) intercropping implantation was investigated. A field experiment with 15N labeling fertilizer was performed in randomized block design. No form of palisadegrass intercropping implantation affected corn grain yield, total N accumulation and N use efficiency (NUE), which were 8.7 t ha-1, 205 kg ha-1 and 37% respectively. The palisadegrass produced on average 1.9 t of dry mass, absorbing a maximum of 6 kg ha-1 or 5.5% of N fertilizer during corn growing. Furthermore, the palisadegrass did not affect N fertilizer distribution in soil-plant system, in which 28.2% was recovered in the soil and 40.4% in the plants (corn + palisadegrass). The results show that for the three intercropping implantation methods the palisadegrass did not compete with corn for N fertilizer.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 19 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 19 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 3 16%
Professor 3 16%
Researcher 2 11%
Student > Ph. D. Student 2 11%
Other 1 5%
Other 2 11%
Unknown 6 32%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 7 37%
Computer Science 1 5%
Psychology 1 5%
Social Sciences 1 5%
Unknown 9 47%