↓ Skip to main content

The myasthenic patient in crisis: an update of the management in Neurointensive Care Unit

Overview of attention for article published in Arquivos de Neuro-Psiquiatria, September 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (72nd percentile)

Mentioned by

wikipedia
3 Wikipedia pages

Readers on

mendeley
232 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
The myasthenic patient in crisis: an update of the management in Neurointensive Care Unit
Published in
Arquivos de Neuro-Psiquiatria, September 2013
DOI 10.1590/0004-282x20130108
Pubmed ID
Authors

Daniel Agustin Godoy, Leonardo Jardim Vaz de Mello, Luca Masotti, Mario Di Napoli

Abstract

Myasthenia gravis (MG) is an autoimmune disorder affecting neuromuscular transmission leading to generalized or localized muscle weakness due most frequently to the presence of autoantibodies against acetylcholine receptors in the postsynaptic motor end-plate. Myasthenic crisis (MC) is a complication of MG characterized by worsening muscle weakness, resulting in respiratory failure that requires intubation and mechanical ventilation. It also includes postsurgical patients, in whom exacerbation of muscle weakness from MG causes a delay in extubation. MC is a very important, serious, and reversible neurological emergency that affects 20-30% of the myasthenic patients, usually within the first year of illness and maybe the debut form of the disease. Most patients have a predisposing factor that triggers the crisis, generally an infection of the respiratory tract. Immunoglobulins, plasma exchange, and steroids are the cornerstones of immunotherapy. Today with the modern neurocritical care, mortality rate of MC is less than 5%.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 232 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 2 <1%
Colombia 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Unknown 228 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 35 15%
Student > Postgraduate 31 13%
Other 24 10%
Researcher 18 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 16 7%
Other 41 18%
Unknown 67 29%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 107 46%
Nursing and Health Professions 12 5%
Neuroscience 11 5%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 7 3%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 6 3%
Other 17 7%
Unknown 72 31%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 April 2023.
All research outputs
#8,535,472
of 25,374,917 outputs
Outputs from Arquivos de Neuro-Psiquiatria
#387
of 1,368 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#72,060
of 212,480 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Arquivos de Neuro-Psiquiatria
#6
of 22 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,917 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,368 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.0. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 56% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 212,480 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 48th percentile – i.e., 48% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 22 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its contemporaries.