↓ Skip to main content

Non-progressive cerebellar ataxia and previous undetermined acute cerebellar injury: a mysterious clinical condition

Overview of attention for article published in Arquivos de Neuro-Psiquiatria, August 2015
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
2 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
9 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Non-progressive cerebellar ataxia and previous undetermined acute cerebellar injury: a mysterious clinical condition
Published in
Arquivos de Neuro-Psiquiatria, August 2015
DOI 10.1590/0004-282x20150119
Pubmed ID
Authors

Wladimir Bocca Vieira de Rezende Pinto, José Luiz Pedroso, Paulo Victor Sgobbi de Souza, Marcus Vinícius Cristino de Albuquerque, Orlando Graziani Povoas Barsottini

Abstract

Cerebellar ataxias represent a wide group of neurological diseases secondary to dysfunctions of cerebellum or its associated pathways, rarely coursing with acute-onset acquired etiologies and chronic non-progressive presentation. We evaluated patients with acquired non-progressive cerebellar ataxia that presented previous acute or subacute onset. Clinical and neuroimaging characterization of adult patients with acquired non-progressive ataxia were performed. Five patients were identified with the phenotype of acquired non-progressive ataxia. Most patients presented with a juvenile to adult-onset acute to subacute appendicular and truncal cerebellar ataxia with mild to moderate cerebellar or olivopontocerebellar atrophy. Establishing the etiology of the acute triggering events of such ataxias is complex. Non-progressive ataxia in adults must be distinguished from hereditary ataxias.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 9 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 9 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Professor 2 22%
Student > Ph. D. Student 2 22%
Other 1 11%
Student > Postgraduate 1 11%
Unknown 3 33%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 3 33%
Nursing and Health Professions 2 22%
Social Sciences 1 11%
Unknown 3 33%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 March 2016.
All research outputs
#19,945,185
of 25,374,917 outputs
Outputs from Arquivos de Neuro-Psiquiatria
#955
of 1,368 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#190,316
of 277,646 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Arquivos de Neuro-Psiquiatria
#21
of 29 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,917 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 18th percentile – i.e., 18% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,368 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.0. This one is in the 27th percentile – i.e., 27% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 277,646 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 26th percentile – i.e., 26% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 29 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 24th percentile – i.e., 24% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.