↓ Skip to main content

Injecction of trigger points in the temporal muscles of patients with miofascial syndrome

Overview of attention for article published in Arquivos de Neuro-Psiquiatria, October 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (73rd percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (76th percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source
twitter
3 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
19 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
69 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Injecction of trigger points in the temporal muscles of patients with miofascial syndrome
Published in
Arquivos de Neuro-Psiquiatria, October 2015
DOI 10.1590/0004-282x20150135
Pubmed ID
Authors

Svetlana Sabatke, Rosana Herminia Scola, Eduardo S. Paiva, Pedro André Kowacs

Abstract

The aim was to examine the effect of blocking trigger points in the temporal muscles of patients with masticatory myofascial pain syndrome, fibromyalgia and headache. Seventy patients with one trigger point were randomly divided into 3 groups: injection with saline or anesthetic and non-injected (control). Pain was reduced in 87.71% patients injected with saline and 100% injected with anesthetic. Similar results were obtained for headache frequency. With regard to headache intensity, the injection groups differed from the control group, but not between themselves. Treatment with injection at trigger points decreased facial pain and frequency and intensity of headache. Considering the injected substance there was no difference.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 69 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 69 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Postgraduate 13 19%
Student > Bachelor 9 13%
Student > Master 7 10%
Student > Ph. D. Student 4 6%
Professor 3 4%
Other 12 17%
Unknown 21 30%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 25 36%
Nursing and Health Professions 10 14%
Neuroscience 4 6%
Social Sciences 2 3%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 1%
Other 4 6%
Unknown 23 33%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 August 2018.
All research outputs
#6,875,825
of 25,374,647 outputs
Outputs from Arquivos de Neuro-Psiquiatria
#277
of 1,369 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#76,589
of 286,876 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Arquivos de Neuro-Psiquiatria
#7
of 30 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,647 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 72nd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,369 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.0. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 286,876 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 30 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its contemporaries.