↓ Skip to main content

Temporomandibular disorders in fibromyalgia patients: are there different pain onset?

Overview of attention for article published in Arquivos de Neuro-Psiquiatria, March 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (65th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (72nd percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source
twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
11 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
68 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Temporomandibular disorders in fibromyalgia patients: are there different pain onset?
Published in
Arquivos de Neuro-Psiquiatria, March 2016
DOI 10.1590/0004-282x20160017
Pubmed ID
Authors

Fábio J. C. Fujarra, Helena Hideko Seguchi Kaziyama, Silvia Regina D. T. de Siqueira, Lin Tchia Yeng, Cinara M. Camparis, Manoel Jacobsen Teixeira, José Tadeu Tesseroli de Siqueira

Abstract

Objective To identify temporomandibular disorders (TMD) symptoms in two groups of fibromyalgia patients according to the temporal relation between the onset of facial pain (FP) and generalized body pain (GBP). Cross-sectional study design: Fifty-three consecutive women with fibromyalgia and FP were stratified according to the onset of orofacial pain: Group-A (mean age 47.30 ± 14.20 years old), onset of FP preceded GBP; Group-B (mean age 51.33 ± 11.03 years old), the FP started concomitant or after GBP. Clinical assessment Research Diagnostic Criteria for Temporomandibular Disorders and the Visual Analogue Scale. Results Myofascial pain with mouth opening limitation (p = 0.038); right disc displacement with reduction (p = 0.012) and jaw stiffness (p = 0.004) were predominant in Group A. Myofascial pain without mouth opening limitation (p = 0.038) and numbness/burning were more common in Group B. Conclusion All patients had temporomandibular joint symptoms, mainly muscle disorders. The prevalence of myofascial pain with limited mouth opening and right TMJ disc displacement with reduction were higher in Group A.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 68 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 68 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Postgraduate 10 15%
Student > Bachelor 9 13%
Student > Master 7 10%
Professor 4 6%
Student > Ph. D. Student 4 6%
Other 12 18%
Unknown 22 32%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 23 34%
Nursing and Health Professions 9 13%
Psychology 3 4%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 3 4%
Neuroscience 2 3%
Other 5 7%
Unknown 23 34%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 April 2019.
All research outputs
#7,959,659
of 25,371,288 outputs
Outputs from Arquivos de Neuro-Psiquiatria
#339
of 1,369 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#103,419
of 312,595 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Arquivos de Neuro-Psiquiatria
#6
of 22 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,371,288 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 67th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,369 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.0. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 74% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 312,595 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 65% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 22 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its contemporaries.