↓ Skip to main content

Assessment of impairment in activities of daily living in mild cognitive impairment using an individualized scale

Overview of attention for article published in Arquivos de Neuro-Psiquiatria, July 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (76th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (75th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet

Citations

dimensions_citation
10 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
70 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Assessment of impairment in activities of daily living in mild cognitive impairment using an individualized scale
Published in
Arquivos de Neuro-Psiquiatria, July 2016
DOI 10.1590/0004-282x20160075
Pubmed ID
Authors

Giseli de Fátima dos Santos Chaves, Alexandra Martini Oliveira, Juliana Aparecida dos Santos Chaves, Orestes Vicente Forlenza, Ivan Aprahamian, Paula Villela Nunes

Abstract

Mild impairment in activities of daily living (ADL) can occur in Mild Cognitive Impairment (MCI), but the nature and extent of these difficulties need to be further explored. The Canadian occupational performance measure (COPM) is one of the few individualized scales designed to identify self-perceived difficulties in ADL. The present study investigated impairments in ADL using the COPM in elderly with MCI. A total of 58 MCI patients were submitted to the COPM for studies of its validity and reliability. The COPM proved a valid and consistent instrument for evaluating ADL in elderly MCI patients. A total of 74.6% of the MCI patients reported difficulties in ADL. Of these problems, 41.2% involved self-care, 31.4% productivity and 27.4% leisure. This data further corroborates recent reports of possible functional impairment in complex ADL in MCI.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 70 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 70 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 8 11%
Student > Master 7 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 7 10%
Researcher 7 10%
Professor 5 7%
Other 11 16%
Unknown 25 36%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Nursing and Health Professions 15 21%
Medicine and Dentistry 7 10%
Psychology 7 10%
Sports and Recreations 2 3%
Social Sciences 2 3%
Other 9 13%
Unknown 28 40%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 August 2016.
All research outputs
#4,836,328
of 25,374,917 outputs
Outputs from Arquivos de Neuro-Psiquiatria
#168
of 1,368 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#79,503
of 367,263 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Arquivos de Neuro-Psiquiatria
#4
of 24 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,917 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 79th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,368 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.0. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 367,263 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 24 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its contemporaries.