↓ Skip to main content

Safety of switching from natalizumab straight into fingolimod in a group of JCV-positive patients with multiple sclerosis

Overview of attention for article published in Arquivos de Neuro-Psiquiatria, August 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (63rd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
5 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
35 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Safety of switching from natalizumab straight into fingolimod in a group of JCV-positive patients with multiple sclerosis
Published in
Arquivos de Neuro-Psiquiatria, August 2016
DOI 10.1590/0004-282x20160090
Pubmed ID
Authors

Yara Dadalti Fragoso, Soniza Vieira Alves-Leon, Jefferson Becker, Joseph Bruno Bidin Brooks, Eber Castro Correa, Alfredo Damasceno, Paulo Diniz da Gama, Rodrigo Assad da Gama, Andre Palma da Cunha Matta, Ernane Pires Maciel, Thereza Cristina d’Avila Winckler

Abstract

To assess safety of the switch between natalizumab and fingolimod without a washout period. Prospective data on 25 JCV positive patients who underwent this medication switch were collected and analyzed. After a median period of nine months from the medication switch, there were no safety issues to report. The patients had good disease control and no adverse events were reported. Washout may not be necessary in daily practice when switching from natalizumab to fingolimod. Expertise on multiple sclerosis management, however, is essential for drug switching.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 35 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Brazil 1 3%
Unknown 34 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Postgraduate 4 11%
Student > Bachelor 3 9%
Student > Ph. D. Student 3 9%
Researcher 3 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 2 6%
Other 8 23%
Unknown 12 34%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 11 31%
Neuroscience 5 14%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 3 9%
Social Sciences 2 6%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 1 3%
Other 3 9%
Unknown 10 29%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 August 2016.
All research outputs
#15,170,530
of 25,374,917 outputs
Outputs from Arquivos de Neuro-Psiquiatria
#632
of 1,368 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#215,642
of 381,031 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Arquivos de Neuro-Psiquiatria
#7
of 22 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,917 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 38th percentile – i.e., 38% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,368 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.0. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 52% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 381,031 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 41st percentile – i.e., 41% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 22 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 63% of its contemporaries.