↓ Skip to main content

High phenotypic variability in Gerstmann-Sträussler-Scheinker disease

Overview of attention for article published in Arquivos de Neuro-Psiquiatria, June 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
12 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
29 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
High phenotypic variability in Gerstmann-Sträussler-Scheinker disease
Published in
Arquivos de Neuro-Psiquiatria, June 2017
DOI 10.1590/0004-282x20170049
Pubmed ID
Authors

Jerusa Smid, Adalberto Studart, Michele Christine Landemberger, Cleiton Fagundes Machado, Paulo Ribeiro Nóbrega, Nathalie Henriques Silva Canedo, Rodrigo Rizek Schultz, Michel Satya Naslavsky, Sérgio Rosemberg, Fernando Kok, Leila Chimelli, Vilma Regina Martins, Ricardo Nitrini

Abstract

Gerstmann-Sträussler-Scheinker is a genetic prion disease and the most common mutation is p.Pro102Leu. We report clinical, molecular and neuropathological data of seven individuals, belonging to two unrelated Brazilian kindreds, carrying the p.Pro102Leu. Marked differences among patients were observed regarding age at onset, disease duration and clinical presentation. In the first kindred, two patients had rapidly progressive dementia and three exhibited predominantly ataxic phenotypes with variable ages of onset and disease duration. In this family, age at disease onset in the mother and daughter differed by 39 years. In the second kindred, different phenotypes were also reported and earlier ages of onset were associated with 129 heterozygosis. No differences were associated with apoE genotype. In these kindreds, the codon 129 polymorphism could not explain the clinical variability and 129 heterozygosis was associated with earlier disease onset. Neuropathological examination in two patients confirmed the presence of typical plaques and PrPsc immunopositivity.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 29 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 29 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 4 14%
Student > Ph. D. Student 4 14%
Student > Postgraduate 3 10%
Professor > Associate Professor 3 10%
Student > Master 3 10%
Other 5 17%
Unknown 7 24%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 6 21%
Neuroscience 4 14%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 3 10%
Psychology 3 10%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 7%
Other 2 7%
Unknown 9 31%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 September 2017.
All research outputs
#16,584,977
of 25,382,440 outputs
Outputs from Arquivos de Neuro-Psiquiatria
#714
of 1,369 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#198,425
of 330,503 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Arquivos de Neuro-Psiquiatria
#15
of 24 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,382,440 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 34th percentile – i.e., 34% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,369 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.0. This one is in the 47th percentile – i.e., 47% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 330,503 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 39th percentile – i.e., 39% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 24 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.