You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Guideline for multiple sclerosis treatment in Brazil: Consensus from the Neuroimmunology Scientific Department of the Brazilian Academy of Neurology
|
---|---|
Published in |
Arquivos de Neuro-Psiquiatria, January 2017
|
DOI | 10.1590/0004-282x20160185 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Elizabeth Regina Comini-Frota, Cláudia C. F. Vasconcelos, Maria Fernanda Mendes |
Abstract |
Multiple sclerosis has become an ever-increasing challenge to neurologists. With the release of the latest medications on the market, Brazilian neurologists feel divided between following their patients' evolution in accordance with the strict rules established by the Brazilian Ministry of Health regarding drug distribution, or following disease progression and worsening in accordance with the evidence in the literature. Therefore, a systematic review of the main published treatment guidelines was conducted and an escalating therapy proposed for guiding multiple sclerosis patient treatment in Brazil. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Brazil | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 73 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 73 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Researcher | 11 | 15% |
Student > Bachelor | 10 | 14% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 6 | 8% |
Student > Master | 6 | 8% |
Student > Postgraduate | 5 | 7% |
Other | 13 | 18% |
Unknown | 22 | 30% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 13 | 18% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 6 | 8% |
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 6 | 8% |
Neuroscience | 5 | 7% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 4 | 5% |
Other | 12 | 16% |
Unknown | 27 | 37% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 January 2018.
All research outputs
#7,355,930
of 25,374,647 outputs
Outputs from Arquivos de Neuro-Psiquiatria
#302
of 1,369 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#126,087
of 421,653 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Arquivos de Neuro-Psiquiatria
#3
of 18 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,647 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 69th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,369 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.0. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 421,653 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 69% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 18 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its contemporaries.