You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Home-based exercise program in TSP/HAM individuals: a feasibility and effectiveness study
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Arquivos de Neuro-Psiquiatria, April 2017
|
| DOI | 10.1590/0004-282x20170022 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Lívia D Facchinetti, Abelardo Q Araújo, Marcus Tt Silva, Ana Claudia C Leite, Mariana F Azevedo, Gisele L Chequer, Raquel Vc Oliveira, Arthur S Ferreira, Marco Antonio Lima |
| Abstract |
To investigate the feasibility and effectiveness of a home-based exercise program in TSP/HAM individuals. Twenty-three TSP/HAM individuals divided in two groups according to Timed Up and Go (TUG) score (<20s vs ≥20s) performed a 20-week home-based exercise program. The primary outcomes were exercise adherence, maximum voluntary isometric contraction of lower limbs (MVIC), Barthel Index and SF-36. Secondary outcomes were adverse effects and barriers to exercise practice. MVIC and the social functioning domain in SF-36 improved significantly in TUG <20s group. The individuals in the TUG ≥20s group improved significantly their physical functioning domain in SF-36. The total adherence to the 20-week home-based exercise program was 90%. There were mild to moderate adverse events related to exercise program. There were no adverse events related to MVIC test. The home-based exercise program was feasible and effective in improving disability and quality of life in individuals with TSP/HAM. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Brazil | 2 | 67% |
| Unknown | 1 | 33% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 3 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 79 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 79 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 14 | 18% |
| Student > Master | 9 | 11% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 8 | 10% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 6 | 8% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 4 | 5% |
| Other | 13 | 16% |
| Unknown | 25 | 32% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 16 | 20% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 12 | 15% |
| Sports and Recreations | 7 | 9% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 3 | 4% |
| Psychology | 3 | 4% |
| Other | 9 | 11% |
| Unknown | 29 | 37% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 March 2022.
All research outputs
#16,051,091
of 25,382,440 outputs
Outputs from Arquivos de Neuro-Psiquiatria
#684
of 1,369 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#185,119
of 323,961 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Arquivos de Neuro-Psiquiatria
#11
of 25 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,382,440 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 34th percentile – i.e., 34% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,369 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.0. This one is in the 47th percentile – i.e., 47% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 323,961 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 39th percentile – i.e., 39% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 25 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 52% of its contemporaries.