↓ Skip to main content

Different outcomes of phonemic verbal fluency in Parkinson’s disease patients with subthalamic nucleus deep brain stimulation

Overview of attention for article published in Arquivos de Neuro-Psiquiatria, April 2017
Altmetric Badge

Citations

dimensions_citation
4 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
38 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Different outcomes of phonemic verbal fluency in Parkinson’s disease patients with subthalamic nucleus deep brain stimulation
Published in
Arquivos de Neuro-Psiquiatria, April 2017
DOI 10.1590/0004-282x20170024
Pubmed ID
Authors

Aline Juliane Romann, Bárbara Costa Beber, Maira Rozenfeld Olchik, Carlos R M Rieder

Abstract

Subthalamic nucleus deep brain stimulation (STN-DBS) is a surgical technique to treat motor symptoms in patients with Parkinson's disease (PD). Studies have shown that STN-DBS may cause a decline in verbal fluency performance. We aimed to verify the effects of STN-DBS on the performance of phonemic verbal fluency in Brazilian PD patients. Sixteen participants were evaluated on the Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale - Part III and for phonemic fluency ("FAS" version) in the conditions of on- and off-stimulation. We identified two different patterns of phonemic verbal fluency outcomes. The results indicate that there may be no expected pattern of effect of bilateral STN-DBS in the phonemic fluency, and patients may present with different outcomes for some reason not well understood.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 38 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 38 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 6 16%
Student > Ph. D. Student 6 16%
Student > Postgraduate 5 13%
Student > Bachelor 5 13%
Student > Master 3 8%
Other 2 5%
Unknown 11 29%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 6 16%
Neuroscience 6 16%
Psychology 6 16%
Nursing and Health Professions 3 8%
Engineering 3 8%
Other 3 8%
Unknown 11 29%