↓ Skip to main content

Usefulness of diffusion tensor imaging in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis: potential biomarker and association with the cognitive profile

Overview of attention for article published in Arquivos de Neuro-Psiquiatria, May 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (79th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (90th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
2 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
30 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Usefulness of diffusion tensor imaging in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis: potential biomarker and association with the cognitive profile
Published in
Arquivos de Neuro-Psiquiatria, May 2017
DOI 10.1590/0004-282x20170032
Pubmed ID
Authors

Marcelo Chaves, Mariela Bettini, Maria Cecilia Fernandez, Maria Jose Garcia Basalo, Juan Ignacio Rojas, Cristina Besada, Edgardo Cristiano, Angel Golimstok, Marcelo Rugiero

Abstract

This was a case-control study conducted from December 1, 2012 to December 1, 2014. Clinical and demographic data were recorded. A neuropsychological test battery adapted to ALS patients was used. An MRI with DTI was performed in all patients and fractional anisotropy (FA) was analyzed in the white matter using the tract based spatial statistics program. Twenty-four patients with ALS (15 females, mean age 66.9 + -2.3) and 13 healthy controls (four females, average age 66.9 + - 2) were included. The DTI showed white matter damage in ALS patients vs. healthy controls (p < 0.001). In our preliminary study the alterations of white matter in DTI were significantly associated with cognitive impairment in patients with ALS.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 30 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 30 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 6 20%
Student > Bachelor 5 17%
Researcher 4 13%
Other 2 7%
Student > Doctoral Student 1 3%
Other 4 13%
Unknown 8 27%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 10 33%
Psychology 4 13%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 7%
Neuroscience 2 7%
Chemical Engineering 1 3%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 11 37%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 10. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 July 2017.
All research outputs
#3,711,488
of 25,382,440 outputs
Outputs from Arquivos de Neuro-Psiquiatria
#116
of 1,369 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#64,335
of 324,557 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Arquivos de Neuro-Psiquiatria
#2
of 22 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,382,440 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 85th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,369 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.0. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 324,557 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 22 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.