↓ Skip to main content

Argentina-Alzheimer's disease neuroimaging initiative (Arg-ADNI): neuropsychological evolution profile after one-year follow up

Overview of attention for article published in Arquivos de Neuro-Psiquiatria, April 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (83rd percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (86th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
twitter
4 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
6 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
71 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Argentina-Alzheimer's disease neuroimaging initiative (Arg-ADNI): neuropsychological evolution profile after one-year follow up
Published in
Arquivos de Neuro-Psiquiatria, April 2018
DOI 10.1590/0004-282x20180025
Pubmed ID
Authors

Patricio Chrem Méndez, Ismael Calandri, Federico Nahas, María Julieta Russo, Ignacio Demey, María Eugenia Martín, María Florencia Clarens, Paula Harris, Fernanda Tapajoz, Jorge Campos, Ezequiel I. Surace, Horacio Martinetto, Fernando Ventrice, Gabriela Cohen, Silvia Vázquez, Carlos Romero, Salvador Guinjoan, Ricardo F. Allegri, Gustavo Sevlever

Abstract

The Argentina-Alzheimer's disease neuroimaging initiative (Arg-ADNI) study is a longitudinal prospective cohort of 50 participants at a single institution in Buenos Aires, Argentina. Longitudinal assessments on a neuropsychological test battery were performed on 15 controls, 24 mild cognitive impairment (MCI) patients and 12 Alzheimer's disease (AD) dementia patients. In our study population, there was a high prevalence of positive AD biomarkers in the AD group, 92.3% (12/13); and a low prevalence in the normal controls, 20%; almost half (48%) of the patients diagnosed with MCI had positive amyloid detection. After a one year, the significant differences found at baseline on neuropsychological testing were similar at the follow-up assessment even though the AD group had significantly altered its functional performance (FAQ and CDR). The exception was semantic fluency, which showed greater impairment between the AD group and MCI and normal controls respectively. For these tests, the addition of AD biomarkers as a variable did not significantly alter the variations previously found for the established clinical group's model. Finally, the one-year conversion rate to dementia was 20% in the MCI cohort.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 71 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 71 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 15 21%
Researcher 7 10%
Student > Master 6 8%
Student > Bachelor 5 7%
Student > Doctoral Student 4 6%
Other 14 20%
Unknown 20 28%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 11 15%
Psychology 9 13%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 6 8%
Neuroscience 4 6%
Linguistics 3 4%
Other 13 18%
Unknown 25 35%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 13. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 May 2018.
All research outputs
#2,829,172
of 25,382,440 outputs
Outputs from Arquivos de Neuro-Psiquiatria
#58
of 1,369 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#57,850
of 343,807 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Arquivos de Neuro-Psiquiatria
#2
of 15 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,382,440 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 88th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,369 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.0. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 343,807 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 15 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its contemporaries.