↓ Skip to main content

Aids em idosos: motivos que levam ao diagnóstico tardio

Overview of attention for article published in Revista Brasileira de Enfermagem, December 2016
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
28 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
50 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Aids em idosos: motivos que levam ao diagnóstico tardio
Published in
Revista Brasileira de Enfermagem, December 2016
DOI 10.1590/0034-7167-2016-0370
Pubmed ID
Authors

Rúbia Aguiar Alencar, Suely Itsuko Ciosak

Abstract

to investigate elderly living with HIV/Aids and health professionals, what are the reasons that lead to late diagnosis of HIV infection in the elderly. prospective, qualitative study, conducted at a specialized outpatient clinic with elderly living with HIV/Aids, diagnosed age over 60 years and in the Family Health Strategy units with nurses and physicians. Data were collected through interviews and verified by content analysis, using the theoretical framework of vulnerability. a total of 11 elderly, 11 nurses and 12 physicians participated in the study. Three empirical categories emerged: the late diagnosis of HIV happens against the health service; invisibility of the sexuality of the elderly; and weaknesses in the anti-HIV serology request for the elderly. there are health professionals who see the elderly as asexual, causing the diagnosis of HIV to happen in the secondary and tertiary service instead of primary care.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 50 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 50 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 7 14%
Other 5 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 5 10%
Student > Master 4 8%
Researcher 3 6%
Other 8 16%
Unknown 18 36%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Nursing and Health Professions 11 22%
Medicine and Dentistry 7 14%
Immunology and Microbiology 2 4%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 4%
Psychology 2 4%
Other 6 12%
Unknown 20 40%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 January 2017.
All research outputs
#20,656,820
of 25,374,647 outputs
Outputs from Revista Brasileira de Enfermagem
#454
of 738 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#313,391
of 416,449 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Revista Brasileira de Enfermagem
#3
of 4 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,647 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 738 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 1.9. This one is in the 24th percentile – i.e., 24% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 416,449 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 14th percentile – i.e., 14% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.