You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Clinical and epidemiological teaching of dengue through simulated practice
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Revista Brasileira de Enfermagem, April 2018
|
| DOI | 10.1590/0034-7167-2016-0503 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
João Henrique de Morais Ribeiro, Eloá Otrenti, Renata Ferreira Takahashi, Lúcia Yasuko Izumi Nichiata, Maria Clara Padoveze, Érica Gomes Pereira, Sebastião Silveira Nunes, Anna Luiza de Fátima Pinho Lins Gryschek, Suely Itsuko Ciosak |
| Abstract |
to describe the experience of clinical teaching on dengue and the practice of epidemiological surveillance using problematization methodology. report of experience on educational activity with undergraduate nursing students, held in March 2016, at a public university in the city of São Paulo, conceived in four stages: dialogic lecture, active search of Aedes aegypti, case study and simulation of nursing consultation to individuals with dengue. The activity allowed to retrieve previous knowledge about the disease, respond to exercises that addressed different clinical situations and epidemiological surveillance, including in situ evaluation of possible mosquito outbreaks, and discuss the need to expand prevention and health of the individual and the community, the impact of the media in the dissemination of cases and the coping difficulties experienced in the different levels of attention. the methodology adopted enabled qualified training of students to cope with dengue. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 66 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 66 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unspecified | 9 | 14% |
| Student > Master | 9 | 14% |
| Researcher | 7 | 11% |
| Student > Bachelor | 6 | 9% |
| Other | 4 | 6% |
| Other | 12 | 18% |
| Unknown | 19 | 29% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Nursing and Health Professions | 13 | 20% |
| Unspecified | 9 | 14% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 5 | 8% |
| Environmental Science | 3 | 5% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 3 | 5% |
| Other | 8 | 12% |
| Unknown | 25 | 38% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 February 2018.
All research outputs
#22,767,715
of 25,382,440 outputs
Outputs from Revista Brasileira de Enfermagem
#560
of 736 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#303,742
of 343,807 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Revista Brasileira de Enfermagem
#10
of 11 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,382,440 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 736 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 1.9. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 343,807 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 11 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.