You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Work and Leprosy: women in their pains, struggles and toils
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Revista Brasileira de Enfermagem, January 2018
|
| DOI | 10.1590/0034-7167-2017-0598 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Marcela Gonçalves, Michely Aline Rodrigues do Prado, Simone Santana da Silva, Karen da Silva Santos, Priscila Norié de Araujo, Cinira Magali Fortuna |
| Abstract |
To analyze the interference of leprosy in women's life regarding work and daily life activities. Exploratory qualitative study developed from semi-structured interviews and with the use of field diaries. The strategy of the organization of data was a thematic analysis of content and referential of the work process in health and gender. The themes presented are: "The leprosy pains", "Changes with the disease and adaptation at work and activities" and "Being a woman with leprosy". On them, we present the aspects that changed in women's life from the leprosy, especially regarding work and daily activities. Beyond physical limitation, there are impacts on social relations and above all on formal work, there may even be dismission. In women affected by leprosy, work and daily activities are directly affected; this deepens the social difficulties and requires attention of health professionals. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Netherlands | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 45 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 45 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 6 | 13% |
| Student > Bachelor | 4 | 9% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 4 | 9% |
| Researcher | 3 | 7% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 2 | 4% |
| Other | 4 | 9% |
| Unknown | 22 | 49% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 7 | 16% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 6 | 13% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 4 | 9% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 2 | 4% |
| Immunology and Microbiology | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 3 | 7% |
| Unknown | 22 | 49% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 March 2018.
All research outputs
#19,951,180
of 25,382,440 outputs
Outputs from Revista Brasileira de Enfermagem
#428
of 736 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#325,409
of 449,550 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Revista Brasileira de Enfermagem
#33
of 59 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,382,440 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 18th percentile – i.e., 18% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 736 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 1.9. This one is in the 38th percentile – i.e., 38% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 449,550 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 23rd percentile – i.e., 23% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 59 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 40th percentile – i.e., 40% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.