↓ Skip to main content

Advance directives of patients: process of implementation by palliative care teams

Overview of attention for article published in Revista Brasileira de Enfermagem, January 2020
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (72nd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
2 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
18 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Advance directives of patients: process of implementation by palliative care teams
Published in
Revista Brasileira de Enfermagem, January 2020
DOI 10.1590/0034-7167-2019-0567
Pubmed ID
Authors

Aline Carniato Dalle Nogario, Edison Luiz Devos Barlem, Jamila Geri Tomaschewski-Barlem, Rosemary Silva da Silveira, Silvana Bastos Cogo, Deciane Pintanela de Carvalho

Abstract

to investigate the process of implementing advance directives in palliative care teams in southern Brazil. an exploratory-descriptive study with a qualitative approach conducted with 51 professionals from seven palliative care teams from December 2018 to April 2019. Data were collected through semi-structured online interviews and submitted to discursive textual analysis. the implementation process starts on approach of the advance directives with patients, so that their wishes and desires are the guiding axis for planning care and conduct. the palliative philosophy is important with regard to advance directives, due to the preparation of these professionals in the search for dignity, quality of life and respect for patient autonomy, in addition to reducing suffering and offering dignified death, based on the understanding of human finitude as a natural process that belongs to life.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 18 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 18 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Unspecified 4 22%
Student > Bachelor 1 6%
Student > Ph. D. Student 1 6%
Student > Master 1 6%
Researcher 1 6%
Other 1 6%
Unknown 9 50%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Unspecified 4 22%
Medicine and Dentistry 2 11%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 6%
Psychology 1 6%
Engineering 1 6%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 9 50%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 May 2023.
All research outputs
#15,181,325
of 25,387,668 outputs
Outputs from Revista Brasileira de Enfermagem
#166
of 738 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#244,379
of 473,401 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Revista Brasileira de Enfermagem
#34
of 130 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,387,668 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 38th percentile – i.e., 38% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 738 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 1.9. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 473,401 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 46th percentile – i.e., 46% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 130 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its contemporaries.