↓ Skip to main content

Análise de modelo de tomada de decisão de enfermeiros gerentes: uma reflexão coletiva

Overview of attention for article published in Revista Brasileira de Enfermagem, August 2015
Altmetric Badge

Citations

dimensions_citation
15 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
47 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Análise de modelo de tomada de decisão de enfermeiros gerentes: uma reflexão coletiva
Published in
Revista Brasileira de Enfermagem, August 2015
DOI 10.1590/0034-7167.2015680414i
Pubmed ID
Authors

Elizabete Araujo Eduardo, Aida Maris Peres, Maria de Lourdes de Almeida, Karina de Dea Roglio, Elizabeth Bernardino

Abstract

to analyze the decision-making model adopted by nurses from the perspective of some decision-making process theories. qualitative approach, based on action research. Semi-structured questionnaires and seminars were conducted from April to June 2012 in order to understand the nature of decisions and the decision-making process of nine nurses in position of managers at a public hospital in Southern Brazil. Data were subjected to content analysis. data were classified in two categories: the current situation of decision-making, which showed a lack of systematization; the construction and collective decision-making, which emphasizes the need to develop a decision-making model. the decision-making model used by nurses is limited because it does not consider two important factors: the limits of human rationality, and the external and internal organizational environments that infl uence and determine right decisions.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 47 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 47 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 9 19%
Lecturer 3 6%
Researcher 3 6%
Professor 3 6%
Student > Bachelor 3 6%
Other 13 28%
Unknown 13 28%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Nursing and Health Professions 20 43%
Social Sciences 4 9%
Medicine and Dentistry 3 6%
Engineering 2 4%
Psychology 1 2%
Other 2 4%
Unknown 15 32%