↓ Skip to main content

Efeitos da acupuntura no tratamento da ansiedade: revisao integrativa

Overview of attention for article published in Revista Brasileira de Enfermagem, June 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • One of the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#3 of 743)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (92nd percentile)

Mentioned by

news
2 news outlets
twitter
7 X users
facebook
4 Facebook pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
37 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
92 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Efeitos da acupuntura no tratamento da ansiedade: revisao integrativa
Published in
Revista Brasileira de Enfermagem, June 2016
DOI 10.1590/0034-7167.2016690325i
Pubmed ID
Authors

Sueli Leiko Takamatsu Goyatá, Carolina Costa Valcanti Avelino, Sérgio Valverde Marques dos Santos, Deusdete Inácio de Souza, Maria Dorise Simão Lopes Gurgel, Fábio de Souza Terra

Abstract

to evaluate the scientific evidence that is available in the literature on the effects of acupuncture for treating anxiety and on the quality of such studies. the study is an integrative review of CINAHL, LILACS, PUBMED-PICO, SciELO, and The Cochrane Library between 2001 and 2014. Keywords anxiety, acupuncture therapy, acupuncture, and anxiety disorders were combined among themselves to ensure a wide search of primary studies. among 514 articles, 67 were selected to be fully read and 19 were included. Among these, 11 were found to have strong evidence levels. Among the six articles about randomized clinical studies, five were found to be of reasonable quality. Two studies used acupuncturist nurses to perform their interventions. Its results showed positive and statistically significant effects from using acupuncture for treating subjects with anxiety. acupuncture seems to be a promising treatment for anxiety; however, there is a need for improving the methodological quality of the research on this field.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 7 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 92 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 92 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 19 21%
Student > Master 15 16%
Student > Postgraduate 8 9%
Lecturer 5 5%
Student > Doctoral Student 5 5%
Other 12 13%
Unknown 28 30%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Nursing and Health Professions 23 25%
Medicine and Dentistry 21 23%
Psychology 3 3%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 2%
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine 2 2%
Other 7 8%
Unknown 34 37%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 25. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 May 2021.
All research outputs
#1,525,034
of 25,563,770 outputs
Outputs from Revista Brasileira de Enfermagem
#3
of 743 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#27,190
of 354,101 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Revista Brasileira de Enfermagem
#1
of 3 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,563,770 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 94th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 743 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 1.9. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 354,101 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them