You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Comparative study of epidural anesthesia in dogs by weight or occipito-coccygeal distance1
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Revista Ceres, February 2017
|
| DOI | 10.1590/0034-737x201764010002 |
| Authors |
Gisele Martins de Paula Leite, Luís Eugênio Franklin Augusto, Vanessa Guedes Pereira, Adriano França Cunha, Kelly Cristine de Sousa Pontes, Jader Lúcio Pinheiro Santana |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 6 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 6 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 1 | 17% |
| Other | 1 | 17% |
| Unknown | 4 | 67% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine | 1 | 17% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 1 | 17% |
| Unknown | 4 | 67% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 January 2019.
All research outputs
#22,764,772
of 25,382,440 outputs
Outputs from Revista Ceres
#35
of 44 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#365,805
of 424,972 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Revista Ceres
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,382,440 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 44 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.6. This one scored the same or higher as 9 of them.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 424,972 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them