↓ Skip to main content

Performance of POC-CCA® in diagnosis of schistosomiasis mansoni in individuals with low parasite burden

Overview of attention for article published in Revista da Sociedade Brasileira de Medicina Tropical, June 2016
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
33 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
90 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Performance of POC-CCA® in diagnosis of schistosomiasis mansoni in individuals with low parasite burden
Published in
Revista da Sociedade Brasileira de Medicina Tropical, June 2016
DOI 10.1590/0037-8682-0070-2016
Pubmed ID
Authors

Liliane Maria Vidal Siqueira, Flavia Fernanda Bubula Couto, Diana Taboada, Áureo Almeida de Oliveira, Nidia Francisca de Figueiredo Carneiro, Edward Oliveira, Paulo Marcos Zech Coelho, Naftale Katz

Abstract

Schistosomiasis, caused by Schistosoma mansoni, is a public health concern in Brazil. However, the most popular diagnostic method, the Kato-Katz technique, exhibits low sensitivity in low-endemicity areas. We aimed to compare the performance of an immunological assay, the point-of-care circulating cathodic antigen (POC-CCA®) test, with that of two parasitological techniques in a low-endemicity population. Our study included 141 individuals living in Estreito de Miralta, Minas Gerais, Brazil. Fecal samples were obtained from all participants and analyzed for schistosomiasis using two parasitological techniques: the Kato-Katz technique and the saline gradient technique. Additionally, POC-CCA® strips were utilized for testing urine samples. The results obtained by the different techniques were compared. Analysis of two or 24 slides using the Kato-Katz technique resulted in a positivity rate of 10.6% (15/141) or 19.1% (27/141), respectively. The saline gradient technique yielded a positivity rate of 17.0% (24/141). The prevalence according to both parasitological techniques was 24.1% (34/141). The POC-CCA® test yielded a positivity rate of 22.7% (32/141); however, the positivity rate was merely 2.1% if trace results were considered negative. The agreements observed between POC-CCA® and the parasitological techniques were good (Kappa indexes > 0.64). The POC-CCA® test was more sensitive than the two-slide Kato-Katz technique (p < 0.05) in detecting cases of S. mansoni infection when trace results were considered positive. These findings reinforce the importance of using multiple diagnostic techniques in low-endemicity areas for effective control of disease.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 90 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Brazil 2 2%
Unknown 88 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 16 18%
Researcher 14 16%
Student > Ph. D. Student 11 12%
Student > Bachelor 10 11%
Student > Postgraduate 8 9%
Other 15 17%
Unknown 16 18%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 23 26%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 14 16%
Medicine and Dentistry 12 13%
Immunology and Microbiology 7 8%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 3 3%
Other 9 10%
Unknown 22 24%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 July 2016.
All research outputs
#19,942,887
of 25,371,288 outputs
Outputs from Revista da Sociedade Brasileira de Medicina Tropical
#669
of 1,193 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#254,505
of 353,651 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Revista da Sociedade Brasileira de Medicina Tropical
#10
of 13 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,371,288 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 18th percentile – i.e., 18% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,193 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.9. This one is in the 38th percentile – i.e., 38% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 353,651 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 23rd percentile – i.e., 23% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 13 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 7th percentile – i.e., 7% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.