↓ Skip to main content

Mayaro fever in an HIV-infected patient suspected of having Chikungunya fever

Overview of attention for article published in Revista da Sociedade Brasileira de Medicina Tropical, October 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
5 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
11 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
86 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Mayaro fever in an HIV-infected patient suspected of having Chikungunya fever
Published in
Revista da Sociedade Brasileira de Medicina Tropical, October 2016
DOI 10.1590/0037-8682-0093-2016
Pubmed ID
Authors

Cássia Fernanda Estofolete, Mânlio Tasso Oliveira Mota, Danila Vedovello, Delzi Vinha Nunes de Góngora, Irineu Luiz Maia, Maurício Lacerda Nogueira

Abstract

Arboviruses impose a serious threat to public health services. We report a case of a patient returning from a work trip to the Amazon basin with myalgia, arthralgia, fever, and headache. During this travel, the patient visited riverside communities. Both dengue and Chikungunya fevers were first suspected, tested for, and excluded. Mayaro fever was then confirmed by reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction followed by next-generation sequencing and phylogenetic reconstruction. The increased awareness of physicians and consequent detection of Mayaro virus in this case was only possible due a previous surveillance program with specific health personnel training about these neglected arboviruses.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 86 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 1%
United States 1 1%
Brazil 1 1%
Unknown 83 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 20 23%
Student > Bachelor 16 19%
Student > Master 11 13%
Student > Postgraduate 7 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 5 6%
Other 14 16%
Unknown 13 15%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 16 19%
Medicine and Dentistry 15 17%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 11 13%
Immunology and Microbiology 8 9%
Nursing and Health Professions 5 6%
Other 8 9%
Unknown 23 27%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 December 2016.
All research outputs
#15,169,949
of 25,374,917 outputs
Outputs from Revista da Sociedade Brasileira de Medicina Tropical
#401
of 1,193 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#183,611
of 332,577 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Revista da Sociedade Brasileira de Medicina Tropical
#5
of 10 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,917 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 38th percentile – i.e., 38% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,193 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.9. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 64% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 332,577 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 10 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 5 of them.