↓ Skip to main content

Does my patient have chronic Chagas disease? Development and temporal validation of a diagnostic risk score

Overview of attention for article published in Revista da Sociedade Brasileira de Medicina Tropical, June 2016
Altmetric Badge

Citations

dimensions_citation
7 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
57 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Does my patient have chronic Chagas disease? Development and temporal validation of a diagnostic risk score
Published in
Revista da Sociedade Brasileira de Medicina Tropical, June 2016
DOI 10.1590/0037-8682-0196-2016
Pubmed ID
Authors

Pedro Emmanuel Alvarenga Americano do Brasil, Sergio Salles Xavier, Marcelo Teixeira Holanda, Alejandro Marcel Hasslocher-Moreno, José Ueleres Braga

Abstract

With the globalization of Chagas disease, unexperienced health care providers may have difficulties in identifying which patients should be examined for this condition. This study aimed to develop and validate a diagnostic clinical prediction model for chronic Chagas disease. This diagnostic cohort study included consecutive volunteers suspected to have chronic Chagas disease. The clinical information was blindly compared to serological tests results, and a logistic regression model was fit and validated. The development cohort included 602 patients, and the validation cohort included 138 patients. The Chagas disease prevalence was 19.9%. Sex, age, referral from blood bank, history of living in a rural area, recognizing the kissing bug, systemic hypertension, number of siblings with Chagas disease, number of relatives with a history of stroke, ECG with low voltage, anterosuperior divisional block, pathologic Q wave, right bundle branch block, and any kind of extrasystole were included in the final model. Calibration and discrimination in the development and validation cohorts (ROC AUC 0.904 and 0.912, respectively) were good. Sensitivity and specificity analyses showed that specificity reaches at least 95% above the predicted 43% risk, while sensitivity is at least 95% below the predicted 7% risk. Net benefit decision curves favor the model across all thresholds. A nomogram and an online calculator (available at http://shiny.ipec.fiocruz.br:3838/pedrobrasil/chronic_chagas_disease_prediction/) were developed to aid in individual risk estimation.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 57 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 57 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 12 21%
Student > Master 7 12%
Student > Ph. D. Student 7 12%
Student > Bachelor 6 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 6 11%
Other 8 14%
Unknown 11 19%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 13 23%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 5 9%
Social Sciences 5 9%
Engineering 4 7%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 5%
Other 14 25%
Unknown 13 23%