↓ Skip to main content

Prevalence of zoonotic visceral leishmaniasis in dogs in an endemic area of Brazil

Overview of attention for article published in Revista da Sociedade Brasileira de Medicina Tropical, June 2015
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
18 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
72 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Prevalence of zoonotic visceral leishmaniasis in dogs in an endemic area of Brazil
Published in
Revista da Sociedade Brasileira de Medicina Tropical, June 2015
DOI 10.1590/0037-8682-0224-2014
Pubmed ID
Authors

Danillo de Souza Pimentel, Rafael Antonio Nascimento Ramos, Marília de Andrade Santana, Carina Scanoni Maia, Gílcia Aparecida de Carvalho, Hernande Pereira da Silva, Leucio Câmara Alves

Abstract

The northeast region of Brazil is endemic for zoonotic visceral leishmaniasis (ZVL). The aim of this study was to determine the prevalence of infection in dogs in Petrolina. Blood samples were collected from dogs (n = 600), and bone-marrow biopsy was performed in animals with positive serological test results that presented clinical signs of ZVL. The serological analyses were performed using an enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) (S7(r)Biogene). Of the 600 dogs tested, 19% (115/600) presented anti-L. infantum chagasi antibodies. Our data are important because canine infection is an important risk factor for the human disease.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 72 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 72 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 18 25%
Student > Bachelor 11 15%
Researcher 8 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 4 6%
Student > Ph. D. Student 4 6%
Other 9 13%
Unknown 18 25%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 13 18%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 8 11%
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine 7 10%
Immunology and Microbiology 6 8%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 6 8%
Other 11 15%
Unknown 21 29%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 July 2015.
All research outputs
#22,759,802
of 25,374,647 outputs
Outputs from Revista da Sociedade Brasileira de Medicina Tropical
#953
of 1,193 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#236,909
of 278,181 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Revista da Sociedade Brasileira de Medicina Tropical
#26
of 32 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,647 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,193 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.9. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 278,181 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 32 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.