↓ Skip to main content

Diagnosing schistosomiasis: where are we?

Overview of attention for article published in Revista da Sociedade Brasileira de Medicina Tropical, January 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (73rd percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (80th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user
patent
1 patent

Citations

dimensions_citation
39 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
125 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Diagnosing schistosomiasis: where are we?
Published in
Revista da Sociedade Brasileira de Medicina Tropical, January 2014
DOI 10.1590/0037-8682-0231-2013
Pubmed ID
Authors

Luciana Inácia Gomes, Martin Johannes Enk, Ana Rabello

Abstract

In light of the World Health Organization's initiative to extend schistosomiasis morbidity and mortality control programs by including a disease elimination strategy in low endemic settings, this paper reviews diagnostic tools described during the last decades and provide an overview of ongoing efforts in making an efficient diagnostic tool available worldwide. A literature search on PubMed using the search criteria schistosomiasis and diagnosis within the period from 1978 to 2013 was carried out. Articles with abstract in English and that used laboratory techniques specifically developed for the detection of schistosomiasis in humans were included. Publications were categorized according to the methodology applied (parasitological, immunological, or molecular) and stage of development (in house development, limited field, or large scale field testing). The initial research generated 4,535 publications, of which only 643 met the inclusion criteria. The vast majority (537) of the publications focused on immunological techniques; 81 focused on parasitological diagnosis, and 25 focused on molecular diagnostic methods. Regarding the stage of development, 307 papers referred to in-house development, 202 referred to limited field tests, and 134 referred to large scale field testing. The data obtained show that promising new diagnostic tools, especially for Schistosoma antigen and deoxyribonucleic acid (DNA) detection, which are characterized by high sensitivity and specificity, are being developed. In combination with international funding initiatives these tools may result in a significant step forward in successful disease elimination and surveillance, which is to make efficient tests accessible and its large use self-sustainable for control programs in endemic countries.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 125 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Burkina Faso 1 <1%
Switzerland 1 <1%
France 1 <1%
Ghana 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Unknown 119 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 34 27%
Student > Ph. D. Student 15 12%
Student > Bachelor 11 9%
Researcher 11 9%
Student > Postgraduate 10 8%
Other 20 16%
Unknown 24 19%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 25 20%
Medicine and Dentistry 19 15%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 14 11%
Immunology and Microbiology 8 6%
Nursing and Health Professions 7 6%
Other 19 15%
Unknown 33 26%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 March 2017.
All research outputs
#7,355,485
of 25,373,627 outputs
Outputs from Revista da Sociedade Brasileira de Medicina Tropical
#141
of 1,193 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#80,280
of 319,271 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Revista da Sociedade Brasileira de Medicina Tropical
#3
of 21 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,373,627 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 69th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,193 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.9. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 319,271 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 21 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its contemporaries.