↓ Skip to main content

Zika in Pernambuco: rewriting the first outbreak

Overview of attention for article published in Revista da Sociedade Brasileira de Medicina Tropical, October 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (81st percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (90th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
29 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
134 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Zika in Pernambuco: rewriting the first outbreak
Published in
Revista da Sociedade Brasileira de Medicina Tropical, October 2016
DOI 10.1590/0037-8682-0245-2016
Pubmed ID
Authors

Carlos Alexandre Antunes de Brito, Cecilia Coelho Moraes de Brito, Augusto César Oliveira, Marilia Rocha, Caio Atanásio, Carolina Asfora, Júlio Dourado Matos, Anton Saraiva Lima, Maria Fátima Militão Albuquerque

Abstract

A Zika virus epidemic was registered in 2015 in Northeast Brazil. In the State of Pernambuco, thousands of classical cases transpired, and in the following months, neurological disturbances in adults and microcephaly in newborns emerged as complications. After the peak of the epidemic, the official system reported only four cases of Zika virus but over 100,000 cases of dengue virus. The vigilance system was unable to retrospectively estimate cases or to issue an alert to officially notified cases with possible inconsistence concerning specific arbovirosis diagnoses. To evaluate the frequency of different arbovirosis diagnoses based on clinical-epidemiologic criteria, from January to April 2015, we conducted a hospital-based cross-sectional study retrospectively analyzing suspected cases of arbovirosis. Of 1 , 046 total suspected cases of arbovirus, 895 (86%) were classified as probable Zika virus cases, and 151 (14%) as probable dengue virus cases. The most frequent manifestations in probable Zika virus cases were exanthema (100%), pruritus (50.7%), fever (20.4%) and arthralgia (27.7%). In contrast to the official data, during the peak months of the arbovirosis epidemic of 2015, most cases were compatible with Zika virus infections. Hospital-based studies, although retrospective and based on secondary data from clinical files, might provide a better estimate of the number of cases relative to currently available data, if derived from several urgent care units of representative areas of a city or state.This would partially retrospectively correct some inconsistences regarding official notifications.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 134 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Brazil 4 3%
Unknown 130 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 28 21%
Researcher 19 14%
Student > Bachelor 16 12%
Student > Postgraduate 12 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 10 7%
Other 29 22%
Unknown 20 15%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 37 28%
Nursing and Health Professions 13 10%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 12 9%
Social Sciences 9 7%
Immunology and Microbiology 6 4%
Other 28 21%
Unknown 29 22%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 10. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 April 2017.
All research outputs
#3,622,393
of 25,374,917 outputs
Outputs from Revista da Sociedade Brasileira de Medicina Tropical
#57
of 1,193 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#59,263
of 332,577 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Revista da Sociedade Brasileira de Medicina Tropical
#1
of 10 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,917 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 85th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,193 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.9. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 332,577 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 10 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them