↓ Skip to main content

Acute disseminated encephalomyelitis following inactivated influenza vaccination in the Brazilian Amazon: a case report

Overview of attention for article published in Revista da Sociedade Brasileira de Medicina Tropical, August 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (66th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
4 X users
facebook
2 Facebook pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
4 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
22 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Acute disseminated encephalomyelitis following inactivated influenza vaccination in the Brazilian Amazon: a case report
Published in
Revista da Sociedade Brasileira de Medicina Tropical, August 2015
DOI 10.1590/0037-8682-0314-2014
Pubmed ID
Authors

Solange Dourado de Andrade, Maria Graciede Filha Santarém Andrade, Pablo José Santos, Maria de Lourdes Galvão, Mariana Martins de Barros, Rajendranath Ramasawmy, Izabella Picinin Safe, Wuelton Marcelo Monteiro, Meritxell Sabidó, Maria das Graças Costa Alecrim

Abstract

Here, we describe a case of acute disseminated encephalomyelitis (ADEM) that occurred during a plausible risk interval following inactivated influenza vaccination in a previously healthy 27-year-old man from Manaus, Brazil. He was treated with intravenous methylprednisolone and immunoglobulin. One-month follow-up revealed resolution of the brain lesions, but not of the spinal cord lesions. No recurrence or progression of the main neurological symptoms was observed. After two years of monitoring, the patient continues to experience weak lower limbs and urinary retention. Thus, we recommend that ADEM should be considered in a patient presenting with neurological symptoms after influenza vaccination.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 22 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 22 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Librarian 3 14%
Researcher 3 14%
Student > Doctoral Student 2 9%
Student > Ph. D. Student 2 9%
Other 1 5%
Other 4 18%
Unknown 7 32%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 7 32%
Neuroscience 2 9%
Computer Science 1 5%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 5%
Psychology 1 5%
Other 1 5%
Unknown 9 41%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 December 2023.
All research outputs
#15,168,964
of 25,373,627 outputs
Outputs from Revista da Sociedade Brasileira de Medicina Tropical
#401
of 1,193 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#134,174
of 276,419 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Revista da Sociedade Brasileira de Medicina Tropical
#6
of 18 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,373,627 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 38th percentile – i.e., 38% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,193 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.9. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 64% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 276,419 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 49th percentile – i.e., 49% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 18 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its contemporaries.