↓ Skip to main content

Congenital Chagas disease: an update

Overview of attention for article published in Memórias do Instituto Oswaldo Cruz, March 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (67th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (87th percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source
twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
117 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
249 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Congenital Chagas disease: an update
Published in
Memórias do Instituto Oswaldo Cruz, March 2015
DOI 10.1590/0074-02760140405
Pubmed ID
Authors

Yves Carlier, Sergio Sosa-Estani, Alejandro O Luquetti, Pierre Buekens

Abstract

Congenital infection with Trypanosoma cruzi is a global problem, occurring on average in 5% of children born from chronically infected mothers in endemic areas, with variations depending on the region. This presentation aims to focus on and update epidemiological data, research methods, involved factors, control strategy and possible prevention of congenital infection with T. cruzi. Considering that etiological treatment of the child is always effective if performed before one year of age, the diagnosis of infection in pregnant women and their newborns has to become the standard of care and integrated into the surveillance programs of syphilis and human immunodeficiency virus. In addition to the standard tests, polymerase chain reaction performed on blood of neonates of infected mothers one month after birth might improve the diagnosis of congenital infection. Recent data bring out that its transmission can be prevented through treatment of infected women before they become pregnant. The role of parasite genotypes and host genetic factors in parasite transmission and development of infection in foetuses/neonates has to be more investigated in order to better estimate the risk factors and impact on health of congenital infection with T. cruzi.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 249 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Argentina 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Unknown 247 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 38 15%
Student > Bachelor 30 12%
Student > Doctoral Student 24 10%
Student > Ph. D. Student 22 9%
Other 19 8%
Other 52 21%
Unknown 64 26%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 48 19%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 42 17%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 31 12%
Nursing and Health Professions 11 4%
Immunology and Microbiology 9 4%
Other 32 13%
Unknown 76 31%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 June 2022.
All research outputs
#7,960,693
of 25,374,917 outputs
Outputs from Memórias do Instituto Oswaldo Cruz
#283
of 1,502 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#86,198
of 273,814 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Memórias do Instituto Oswaldo Cruz
#4
of 31 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,917 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 67th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,502 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.6. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 273,814 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 67% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 31 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its contemporaries.