↓ Skip to main content

Pyriproxyfen and the microcephaly epidemic in Brazil - an ecological approach to explore the hypothesis of their association

Overview of attention for article published in Memórias do Instituto Oswaldo Cruz, October 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (82nd percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (93rd percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
3 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
31 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
113 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Pyriproxyfen and the microcephaly epidemic in Brazil - an ecological approach to explore the hypothesis of their association
Published in
Memórias do Instituto Oswaldo Cruz, October 2016
DOI 10.1590/0074-02760160291
Pubmed ID
Authors

Maria de Fatima P Militão de Albuquerque, Wayner V de Souza, Antônio da Cruz G Mendes, Tereza M Lyra, Ricardo AA Ximenes, Thália VB Araújo, Cynthia Braga, Demócrito B Miranda-Filho, Celina MT Martelli, Laura C Rodrigues

Abstract

The microcephaly epidemic in Brazil generated intense debate regarding its causality, and one hypothesised cause of this epidemic, now recognised as congenital Zika virus syndrome, was the treatment of drinking water tanks with pyriproxyfen to control Aedes aegypti larvae. We present the results of a geographical analysis of the association between the prevalence of microcephaly confirmed by Fenton growth charts and the type of larvicide used in the municipalities that were home to the mothers of the affected newborns in the metropolitan region of Recife in Pernambuco, the state in Brazil where the epidemic was first detected. The overall prevalence of microcephaly was 82 per 10,000 live births in the three municipalities that used the larvicide Bti (Bacillus thuringiensis israelensis) instead of pyriproxyfen, and 69 per 10,000 live births in the eleven municipalities that used pyriproxyfen. The difference was not statistically significant. Our results show that the prevalence of microcephaly was not higher in the areas in which pyriproxyfen was used. In this ecological approach, there was no evidence of a correlation between the use of pyriproxyfen in the municipalities and the microcephaly epidemic.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 113 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Brazil 2 2%
United States 1 <1%
Unknown 110 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 26 23%
Student > Master 18 16%
Student > Bachelor 16 14%
Student > Ph. D. Student 8 7%
Student > Postgraduate 8 7%
Other 23 20%
Unknown 14 12%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 31 27%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 15 13%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 11 10%
Social Sciences 7 6%
Nursing and Health Professions 6 5%
Other 23 20%
Unknown 20 18%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 11. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 June 2020.
All research outputs
#3,408,614
of 25,377,790 outputs
Outputs from Memórias do Instituto Oswaldo Cruz
#83
of 1,502 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#54,934
of 318,637 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Memórias do Instituto Oswaldo Cruz
#1
of 15 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,377,790 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 86th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,502 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.6. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 318,637 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 15 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.