↓ Skip to main content

Surveillance of deaths caused by arboviruses in Brazil: from dengue to chikungunya

Overview of attention for article published in Memórias do Instituto Oswaldo Cruz, August 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (74th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (81st percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source
twitter
7 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
29 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
127 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Surveillance of deaths caused by arboviruses in Brazil: from dengue to chikungunya
Published in
Memórias do Instituto Oswaldo Cruz, August 2017
DOI 10.1590/0074-02760160537
Pubmed ID
Authors

Luciano Pamplona de Góes Cavalcanti, André Ricardo Ribas Freitas, Patrícia Brasil, Rivaldo Venâncio da Cunha

Abstract

Did death occur DUE TO dengue, or in a patient WITH dengue virus infection? It seems a matter of semantics, but in fact, it underscores how challenging it is to distinguish whether the disease contributed to death, or was itself the underlying cause of death. Can a death be attributed to chikungunya virus, when some deaths occur after the acute phase? Did the virus decompensate the underlying diseases, leading to death? Did prolonged hospitalisation lead to infection, resulting in the patient's progression to death? Were there iatrogenic complications during patient care? The dengue question, for which there has not yet been a definitive response, resurfaces prominently under the chikungunya surveillance scenario. We are facing an epidemic of a disease that seems to be more lethal than previously thought. The major challenge ahead is to investigate deaths suspected of occurring due to arbovirus infections and to understand the role of each infection in the unfavourable outcome.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 7 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 127 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 127 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 27 21%
Researcher 18 14%
Student > Bachelor 16 13%
Student > Doctoral Student 12 9%
Other 6 5%
Other 22 17%
Unknown 26 20%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 24 19%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 16 13%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 13 10%
Nursing and Health Professions 12 9%
Immunology and Microbiology 6 5%
Other 22 17%
Unknown 34 27%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 March 2021.
All research outputs
#5,142,991
of 25,382,440 outputs
Outputs from Memórias do Instituto Oswaldo Cruz
#149
of 1,502 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#82,033
of 327,503 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Memórias do Instituto Oswaldo Cruz
#4
of 22 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,382,440 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 79th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,502 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.6. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 327,503 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 74% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 22 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its contemporaries.