You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Brazilian scientific journals: challenges, (dis)incentives and one fundamental question
|
---|---|
Published in |
Memórias do Instituto Oswaldo Cruz, October 2017
|
DOI | 10.1590/0074-02760170001 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Adeilton Brandão, Elisa Cupolillo, Claude Pirmez |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 11 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 11 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Researcher | 3 | 27% |
Student > Master | 2 | 18% |
Other | 1 | 9% |
Professor > Associate Professor | 1 | 9% |
Unknown | 4 | 36% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Social Sciences | 3 | 27% |
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 2 | 18% |
Psychology | 1 | 9% |
Engineering | 1 | 9% |
Unknown | 4 | 36% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 11. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 April 2021.
All research outputs
#3,403,590
of 25,382,440 outputs
Outputs from Memórias do Instituto Oswaldo Cruz
#82
of 1,502 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#60,853
of 331,218 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Memórias do Instituto Oswaldo Cruz
#3
of 23 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,382,440 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 86th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,502 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.6. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 331,218 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 23 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its contemporaries.