↓ Skip to main content

Description of an oral Chagas disease outbreak in Venezuela, including a vertically transmitted case

Overview of attention for article published in Memórias do Instituto Oswaldo Cruz, August 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (65th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (77th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
5 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
17 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
65 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Description of an oral Chagas disease outbreak in Venezuela, including a vertically transmitted case
Published in
Memórias do Instituto Oswaldo Cruz, August 2017
DOI 10.1590/0074-02760170009
Pubmed ID
Authors

Belkisyolé Alarcón de Noya, Gladymar Pérez-Chacón, Zoraida Díaz-Bello, Sonia Dickson, Arturo Muñoz-Calderón, Carlos Hernández, Yadira Pérez, Luciano Mauriello, Eyleen Moronta

Abstract

We describe the eleventh major outbreak of foodborne Trypanosoma cruzi transmission in urban Venezuela, including evidence for vertical transmission from the index case to her fetus. After confirming fetal death at 24 weeks of gestation, pregnancy interruption was performed. On direct examination of the amniotic fluid, trypomastigotes were detected. T. cruzi specific-polymerase chain reaction (PCR) also proved positive when examining autopsied fetal organs. Finally, microscopic fetal heart examination revealed amastigote nests. Acute orally transmitted Chagas disease can be life threatening or even fatal for pregnant women and unborn fetuses owing to vertical transmission. There is therefore an urgent need to improve national epidemiologic control measures.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 65 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 65 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 11 17%
Student > Master 9 14%
Student > Bachelor 8 12%
Student > Doctoral Student 7 11%
Student > Ph. D. Student 4 6%
Other 11 17%
Unknown 15 23%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 10 15%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 10 15%
Medicine and Dentistry 9 14%
Immunology and Microbiology 4 6%
Chemistry 2 3%
Other 6 9%
Unknown 24 37%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 August 2017.
All research outputs
#7,716,088
of 25,382,440 outputs
Outputs from Memórias do Instituto Oswaldo Cruz
#271
of 1,502 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#112,458
of 327,503 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Memórias do Instituto Oswaldo Cruz
#5
of 22 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,382,440 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 69th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,502 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.6. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 327,503 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 65% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 22 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its contemporaries.