You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
The history of Chagas disease: reflections on science in action
|
---|---|
Published in |
Memórias do Instituto Oswaldo Cruz, January 2022
|
DOI | 10.1590/0074-02760200372 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Simone Petraglia Kropf, Nísia Trindade Lima |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 22 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 22 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Master | 4 | 18% |
Student > Bachelor | 4 | 18% |
Researcher | 2 | 9% |
Lecturer | 2 | 9% |
Other | 1 | 5% |
Other | 2 | 9% |
Unknown | 7 | 32% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Social Sciences | 4 | 18% |
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 3 | 14% |
Unspecified | 2 | 9% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 2 | 9% |
Arts and Humanities | 1 | 5% |
Other | 3 | 14% |
Unknown | 7 | 32% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 April 2024.
All research outputs
#8,648,221
of 25,657,205 outputs
Outputs from Memórias do Instituto Oswaldo Cruz
#320
of 1,510 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#184,771
of 517,692 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Memórias do Instituto Oswaldo Cruz
#14
of 60 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,657,205 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,510 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.6. This one is in the 41st percentile – i.e., 41% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 517,692 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 59% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 60 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its contemporaries.