↓ Skip to main content

History of domestication and spread of Aedes aegypti - A Review

Overview of attention for article published in Memórias do Instituto Oswaldo Cruz, December 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • One of the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#7 of 1,516)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (98th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (95th percentile)

Citations

dimensions_citation
438 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
946 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
History of domestication and spread of Aedes aegypti - A Review
Published in
Memórias do Instituto Oswaldo Cruz, December 2013
DOI 10.1590/0074-0276130395
Pubmed ID
Authors

Jeffrey R Powell, Walter J Tabachnick

Abstract

The adaptation of insect vectors of human diseases to breed in human habitats (domestication) is one of the most important phenomena in medical entomology. Considerable data are available on the vector mosquito Aedes aegypti in this regard and here we integrate the available information including genetics, behaviour, morphology, ecology and biogeography of the mosquito, with human history. We emphasise the tremendous amount of variation possessed by Ae. aegypti for virtually all traits considered. Typological thinking needs to be abandoned to reach a realistic and comprehensive understanding of this important vector of yellow fever, dengue and Chikungunya.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 16 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 946 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Brazil 5 <1%
United States 4 <1%
France 2 <1%
Colombia 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
South Africa 1 <1%
Madagascar 1 <1%
Philippines 1 <1%
Unknown 930 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 173 18%
Student > Bachelor 144 15%
Researcher 138 15%
Student > Ph. D. Student 118 12%
Student > Doctoral Student 50 5%
Other 129 14%
Unknown 194 21%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 299 32%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 147 16%
Medicine and Dentistry 66 7%
Immunology and Microbiology 44 5%
Environmental Science 35 4%
Other 137 14%
Unknown 218 23%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 141. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 September 2023.
All research outputs
#297,862
of 26,017,215 outputs
Outputs from Memórias do Instituto Oswaldo Cruz
#7
of 1,516 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#2,642
of 326,548 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Memórias do Instituto Oswaldo Cruz
#1
of 24 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,017,215 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,516 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.7. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 326,548 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 24 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.