↓ Skip to main content

Drug discovery for Chagas disease should consider Trypanosoma cruzi strain diversity

Overview of attention for article published in Memórias do Instituto Oswaldo Cruz, August 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (71st percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (64th percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source
twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
115 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
202 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Drug discovery for Chagas disease should consider Trypanosoma cruzi strain diversity
Published in
Memórias do Instituto Oswaldo Cruz, August 2014
DOI 10.1590/0074-0276140156
Pubmed ID
Authors

Bianca Zingales, Michael A Miles, Carolina B Moraes, Alejandro Luquetti, Felipe Guhl, Alejandro G Schijman, Isabela Ribeiro

Abstract

This opinion piece presents an approach to standardisation of an important aspect of Chagas disease drug discovery and development: selecting Trypanosoma cruzi strains for in vitro screening. We discuss the rationale for strain selection representing T. cruzi diversity and provide recommendations on the preferred parasite stage for drug discovery, T. cruzi discrete typing units to include in the panel of strains and the number of strains/clones for primary screens and lead compounds. We also consider experimental approaches for in vitro drug assays. The Figure illustrates the current Chagas disease drug-discovery and development landscape.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 202 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Mexico 1 <1%
India 1 <1%
Argentina 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Unknown 198 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 32 16%
Student > Master 31 15%
Student > Ph. D. Student 28 14%
Student > Doctoral Student 20 10%
Student > Bachelor 17 8%
Other 33 16%
Unknown 41 20%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 40 20%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 30 15%
Medicine and Dentistry 21 10%
Chemistry 21 10%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 16 8%
Other 25 12%
Unknown 49 24%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 June 2022.
All research outputs
#7,355,485
of 25,371,288 outputs
Outputs from Memórias do Instituto Oswaldo Cruz
#257
of 1,502 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#67,474
of 247,497 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Memórias do Instituto Oswaldo Cruz
#10
of 31 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,371,288 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 69th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,502 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.6. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 247,497 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 31 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 64% of its contemporaries.