You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Litchi (Litchi chinensis Sonn) propagation. New Technologies and innovations
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Revista Brasileira de Fruticultura, September 2018
|
| DOI | 10.1590/0100-29452018575 |
| Authors |
Víctor Galán Saúco, Michel Jahiel, Pedro Hernandez Delgado Modesto, Xu Ming Huang, Sisir Mitra, Oswaldo Kiyoshi Yamanishi, Renata Aparecida de Andrade |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 14 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 14 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Other | 2 | 14% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 2 | 14% |
| Researcher | 2 | 14% |
| Student > Bachelor | 1 | 7% |
| Unspecified | 1 | 7% |
| Other | 1 | 7% |
| Unknown | 5 | 36% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 5 | 36% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 1 | 7% |
| Unspecified | 1 | 7% |
| Psychology | 1 | 7% |
| Engineering | 1 | 7% |
| Other | 0 | 0% |
| Unknown | 5 | 36% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 October 2018.
All research outputs
#4,838,109
of 25,385,509 outputs
Outputs from Revista Brasileira de Fruticultura
#8
of 141 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#88,806
of 350,978 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Revista Brasileira de Fruticultura
#1
of 5 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,385,509 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 79th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 141 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.1. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 350,978 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 5 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them