Title |
The role of gadoxetic acid as a paramagnetic contrast medium in the characterization and detection of focal liver lesions: a review
|
---|---|
Published in |
Radiologia Brasileira, February 2015
|
DOI | 10.1590/0100-3984.2013.1794 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Renata Lilian Bormann, Eduardo Lima da Rocha, Marcelo Longo Kierzenbaum, Bruno Cheregati Pedrassa, Lucas Rios Torres, Giuseppe D'Ippolito |
Abstract |
Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) has several advantages in the evaluation of cancer patients with thoracic lesions, including involvement of the chest wall, pleura, lungs, mediastinum, esophagus and heart. It is a quite useful tool in the diagnosis, staging, surgical planning, treatment response evaluation and follow-up of these patients. In the present review, the authors contextualize the relevance of MRI in the evaluation of thoracic lesions in cancer patients. Considering that MRI is a widely available method with high contrast and spatial resolution and without the risks associated with the use of ionizing radiation, its use combined with new techniques such as cine-MRI and functional methods such as perfusion- and diffusion-weighted imaging may be useful as an alternative tool with performance comparable or complementary to conventional radiological methods such as radiography, computed tomography and PET/CT imaging in the evaluation of patients with thoracic neoplasias. |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 1 | 50% |
Unknown | 1 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 1 | 50% |
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 50% |
Mendeley readers
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 15 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Postgraduate | 3 | 20% |
Student > Bachelor | 3 | 20% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 1 | 7% |
Other | 1 | 7% |
Lecturer > Senior Lecturer | 1 | 7% |
Other | 4 | 27% |
Unknown | 2 | 13% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 6 | 40% |
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 2 | 13% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 1 | 7% |
Physics and Astronomy | 1 | 7% |
Immunology and Microbiology | 1 | 7% |
Other | 2 | 13% |
Unknown | 2 | 13% |