↓ Skip to main content

Renal cell carcinoma: histological classification and correlation with imaging findings*

Overview of attention for article published in Radiologia Brasileira, June 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • One of the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#2 of 394)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (95th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
5 news outlets
policy
1 policy source
twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
297 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
448 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Renal cell carcinoma: histological classification and correlation with imaging findings*
Published in
Radiologia Brasileira, June 2015
DOI 10.1590/0100-3984.2013.1927
Pubmed ID
Authors

Valdair F. Muglia, Adilson Prando

Abstract

Renal cell carcinoma (RCC) is the seventh most common histological type of cancer in the Western world and has shown a sustained increase in its prevalence. The histological classification of RCCs is of utmost importance, considering the significant prognostic and therapeutic implications of its histological subtypes. Imaging methods play an outstanding role in the diagnosis, staging and follow-up of RCC. Clear cell, papillary and chromophobe are the most common histological subtypes of RCC, and their preoperative radiological characterization, either followed or not by confirmatory percutaneous biopsy, may be particularly useful in cases of poor surgical condition, metastatic disease, central mass in a solitary kidney, and in patients eligible for molecular targeted therapy. New strategies recently developed for treating renal cancer, such as cryo and radiofrequency ablation, molecularly targeted therapy and active surveillance also require appropriate preoperative characterization of renal masses. Less common histological types, although sharing nonspecific imaging features, may be suspected on the basis of clinical and epidemiological data. The present study is aimed at reviewing the main clinical and imaging findings of histological RCC subtypes.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 448 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Colombia 1 <1%
India 1 <1%
Russia 1 <1%
Unknown 445 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 79 18%
Student > Master 44 10%
Researcher 37 8%
Student > Ph. D. Student 37 8%
Student > Postgraduate 32 7%
Other 79 18%
Unknown 140 31%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 137 31%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 61 14%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 30 7%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 19 4%
Nursing and Health Professions 8 2%
Other 33 7%
Unknown 160 36%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 42. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 March 2024.
All research outputs
#981,676
of 25,371,288 outputs
Outputs from Radiologia Brasileira
#2
of 394 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#11,754
of 281,399 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Radiologia Brasileira
#1
of 4 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,371,288 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 394 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.1. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 281,399 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them