You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Computed tomography findings of paracoccidiodomycosis in musculoskeletal system*
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Radiologia Brasileira, January 2015
|
| DOI | 10.1590/0100-3984.2014.0049 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Francisco Valtenor Araújo Lima, Leonor Garbin Savarese, Lucas Moretti Monsignore, Roberto Martinez, Marcello Henrique Nogueira-Barbosa |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 7 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 7 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 4 | 57% |
| Professor | 1 | 14% |
| Student > Bachelor | 1 | 14% |
| Student > Master | 1 | 14% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 4 | 57% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 2 | 29% |
| Immunology and Microbiology | 1 | 14% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 June 2020.
All research outputs
#8,534,528
of 25,371,288 outputs
Outputs from Radiologia Brasileira
#52
of 394 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#110,286
of 359,515 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Radiologia Brasileira
#3
of 16 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,371,288 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 394 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.1. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 359,515 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 51% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 16 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 68% of its contemporaries.