↓ Skip to main content

Magnetic resonance imaging evaluation of meniscoid superior labrum: normal variant or superior labral tear*

Overview of attention for article published in Radiologia Brasileira, January 2016
Altmetric Badge

Citations

dimensions_citation
6 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
6 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Magnetic resonance imaging evaluation of meniscoid superior labrum: normal variant or superior labral tear*
Published in
Radiologia Brasileira, January 2016
DOI 10.1590/0100-3984.2015.0083
Pubmed ID
Authors

Marcelo Novelino Simão, Emily N. Vinson, Charles E. Spritzer

Abstract

The objective of this study was to determine the incidence of a "meniscoid" superior labrum. This was a retrospective analysis of 582 magnetic resonance imaging examinations of shoulders. Of those 582 examinations, 110 were excluded, for a variety of reasons, and the final analysis therefore included 472 cases. Consensus readings were performed by three musculoskeletal radiologists using specific criteria to diagnose meniscoid labra. A meniscoid superior labrum was identified in 48 (10.2%) of the 472 cases evaluated. Arthroscopic proof was available in 21 cases (43.8%). In 10 (47.6%) of those 21 cases, the operative report did not include the mention a superior labral tear, thus suggesting the presence of a meniscoid labrum. In only one of those cases were there specific comments about a mobile superior labrum (i.e., meniscoid labrum). In the remaining 11 (52.4%), surgical correlation demonstrated superior labral tears. A meniscoid superior labrum is not an infrequent finding. Depending upon assumptions and the requirement of surgical proof, the prevalence of a meniscoid superior labrum in this study was between 2.1% (surgically proven) and 4.8% (projected). However, superior labral tears are just as common and are often confused with meniscoid labra.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 6 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 6 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 1 17%
Student > Postgraduate 1 17%
Unknown 4 67%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 2 33%
Unknown 4 67%