↓ Skip to main content

Ultrasound of ankles in the diagnosis of complications of chikungunya fever

Overview of attention for article published in Radiologia Brasileira, February 2017
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
12 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
23 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Ultrasound of ankles in the diagnosis of complications of chikungunya fever
Published in
Radiologia Brasileira, February 2017
DOI 10.1590/0100-3984.2016.0221
Pubmed ID
Authors

Roberto Mogami, João Luiz Pereira Vaz, Yêdda de Fátima Barcelos Chagas, Rodrigo Sperling Torezani, André de Almeida Vieira, Ana Célia Baptista Koifman, Yasmin Baptista Barbosa, Mirhelen Mendes de Abreu

Abstract

To describe the main ultrasound findings of chikungunya fever in the ankle. This was a cross-sectional observational study involving 52 patients referred to the Hospital Universitário Pedro Ernesto and presenting with clinical and biochemical evidence of chikungunya fever. The examinations were performed by a radiologist with more than 20 years of experience in ultrasound. The predominant gender was female (in 88.5%), and the mean age was 58.4 years. The majority (61.5%) of the patients came from the northern part of the city of Rio de Janeiro, and 46.2% were using corticosteroids to treat inflammatory symptoms. The most common alterations observed by ultrasound were joint effusion (in 69.2%), tenosynovitis (in 59.6%), cellulitis (in 46.2%), Kager's fat pad thickening (in 29.9%), myositis (of the soleus or flexor hallucis longus muscle) (in 17.3%), retrocalcaneal bursitis (in 5.8%), tendon ruptures (in 3.8%), and increased vascular flow on power Doppler (in 3.8%). Signs of synovitis and tenosynovitis were the main ultrasound findings in a predominantly female population with a mean age of 58.4 years. Further studies are needed in order to define the role of ultrasound in the follow-up of such patients.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 23 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 23 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 3 13%
Other 1 4%
Lecturer > Senior Lecturer 1 4%
Professor 1 4%
Student > Postgraduate 1 4%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 16 70%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Nursing and Health Professions 3 13%
Medicine and Dentistry 3 13%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 4%
Unknown 16 70%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 February 2017.
All research outputs
#20,660,571
of 25,382,440 outputs
Outputs from Radiologia Brasileira
#245
of 394 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#251,192
of 323,273 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Radiologia Brasileira
#1
of 3 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,382,440 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 394 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.1. This one is in the 23rd percentile – i.e., 23% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 323,273 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 12th percentile – i.e., 12% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them