↓ Skip to main content

Musculoskeletal pitfalls in 68Ga-PSMA PET/CT

Overview of attention for article published in Radiologia Brasileira, January 2023
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

twitter
4 X users

Readers on

mendeley
2 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Musculoskeletal pitfalls in 68Ga-PSMA PET/CT
Published in
Radiologia Brasileira, January 2023
DOI 10.1590/0100-3984.2023.0003
Pubmed ID
Authors

Írline Cordeiro de Macedo Pontes, Anthony Reis Souza, Eduardo Kaiser Ururahy Nunes Fonseca, Akemi Osawa, Ronaldo Hueb Baroni, Adham do Amaral e Castro

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 2 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 2 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Doctoral Student 2 100%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 2 100%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 October 2023.
All research outputs
#16,288,241
of 25,721,020 outputs
Outputs from Radiologia Brasileira
#114
of 397 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#235,255
of 479,541 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Radiologia Brasileira
#1
of 3 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,721,020 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 34th percentile – i.e., 34% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 397 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.1. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 67% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 479,541 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 47th percentile – i.e., 47% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them