You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
AVALIAÇÃO DE MÉTODOS DE RESTAURAÇÃO FLORESTAL DE MATA DE TABULEIROS-ES
|
---|---|
Published in |
Revista Árvore, February 2015
|
DOI | 10.1590/0100-67622015000100007 |
Authors |
Valéria Hollunder Klippel, José Eduardo Macedo Pezzopane, Gilson Fernandes da Silva, Marcos Vinicius Winckler Caldeira, Luciano Roncete Pimenta, João Vitor Toledo |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 25 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Brazil | 1 | 4% |
Unknown | 24 | 96% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Master | 6 | 24% |
Student > Bachelor | 5 | 20% |
Other | 3 | 12% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 2 | 8% |
Researcher | 1 | 4% |
Other | 0 | 0% |
Unknown | 8 | 32% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Environmental Science | 8 | 32% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 7 | 28% |
Chemistry | 1 | 4% |
Unknown | 9 | 36% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 May 2022.
All research outputs
#8,535,472
of 25,374,917 outputs
Outputs from Revista Árvore
#15
of 81 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#112,028
of 361,178 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Revista Árvore
#1
of 3 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,917 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 81 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.6. This one is in the 48th percentile – i.e., 48% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 361,178 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 51% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them