↓ Skip to main content

Accuracy of doppler ultrasonography in the evaluation of hemodialysis arteriovenous fistula maturity

Overview of attention for article published in Revista do Colégio Brasileiro de Cirurgiões, June 2015
Altmetric Badge

Citations

dimensions_citation
6 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
21 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Accuracy of doppler ultrasonography in the evaluation of hemodialysis arteriovenous fistula maturity
Published in
Revista do Colégio Brasileiro de Cirurgiões, June 2015
DOI 10.1590/0100-69912015003002
Pubmed ID
Authors

João Humberto da Fonseca, Guilherme Benjamin Brandão Pitta, Fausto Miranda

Abstract

to determine the accuracy of Doppler ultrasonography (USD) for hemodialysis arteriovenous fistula (AVF) maturity. we included patients with no prior AVF. Each patient underwent two USD examinations. After initiation of hemodialysis, we followed the patients during the first month of the access use and verified its adequacy to hemodialysis sessions. At statistical analysis we measured specificity, sensitivity, accuracy, ROC curve (Receiver operator characteristic) curve, TG-ROC (Two graph - receiver operator characteristic) and logistic regression. we included 76 patients, of which 51 completed the study. They formed two groups, those who have had good adequacy for hemodialysis (45) and those who had not (6). The average flow volume (FV) and the average draining vein diameter (DVD) of each group were, respectively: 940mL/min (95% CI: 829-1052) and 325mL/min (95% CI: 140-510); and 0.48cm (95% CI: 0.45-0.52) and 0.33cm (95% CI: 0.27-0.40). The area under the ROC curve of FV and DVD were 0.926 and 0.766, respectively. the accuracy of the measured volume flow measured at the draining vein to evaluate maturation of hemodialysis arteriovenous fistula was 85%.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 21 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 21 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 5 24%
Student > Ph. D. Student 4 19%
Student > Bachelor 3 14%
Student > Master 3 14%
Professor 1 5%
Other 2 10%
Unknown 3 14%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 8 38%
Nursing and Health Professions 4 19%
Linguistics 1 5%
Psychology 1 5%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 5%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 6 29%