You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
In-person and telemedicine course models for disaster preparedness: a comparative analysis
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Revista do Colégio Brasileiro de Cirurgiões, June 2018
|
| DOI | 10.1590/0100-6991e-20181710 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Alcir Escocia Dorigatti, Bruno Monteiro Tavares Pereira, Romeo Lages Simões, Juliana Rodrigues Matsuguma, Thiago Rodrigues Araujo Calderan, Gustavo Pereira Fraga |
| Abstract |
to compare the students' performance in face-to-face and telemedicine courses for the training and necessary action in disasters, using telemedicine as an effective training tool. online research conducted after the end of the course of preparation in disasters, carried out in-person, as well as by videoconference. We compared the performance of students in the in-person course and through telemedicine. in the comparison of the results obtained with the pre- and post-test data between the students who attended via telemedicine and in-person, we observed that in the two modalities there was an increase in knowledge (p<0.001). We also observed no statistically significant differences in the posterior evaluation between the in-person and telemedicine courses (p=1.0), however, there was a significant difference at the pre-test evaluative moment (p<0.001). videoconferencing can be effectively used to train health professionals in disaster management, being able to provide adequate knowledge and become an important tool to distance reaching in continuing education. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 1 | 50% |
| Unknown | 1 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 2 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 73 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 73 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 11 | 15% |
| Student > Bachelor | 7 | 10% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 6 | 8% |
| Other | 4 | 5% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 4 | 5% |
| Other | 20 | 27% |
| Unknown | 21 | 29% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 19 | 26% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 7 | 10% |
| Social Sciences | 6 | 8% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 3 | 4% |
| Engineering | 2 | 3% |
| Other | 12 | 16% |
| Unknown | 24 | 33% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 June 2019.
All research outputs
#19,951,180
of 25,385,509 outputs
Outputs from Revista do Colégio Brasileiro de Cirurgiões
#124
of 241 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#250,587
of 341,728 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Revista do Colégio Brasileiro de Cirurgiões
#5
of 8 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,385,509 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 18th percentile – i.e., 18% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 241 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.1. This one is in the 46th percentile – i.e., 46% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 341,728 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 8 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 3 of them.