↓ Skip to main content

PANTURKISM IN XINJIANG AND IN CENTRAL ASIA: BETWEEN SEPARATISM AND INTEGRATION

Overview of attention for article published in Lua Nova: Revista de Cultura e Política, April 2020
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#28 of 286)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (70th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
8 X users

Readers on

mendeley
5 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
PANTURKISM IN XINJIANG AND IN CENTRAL ASIA: BETWEEN SEPARATISM AND INTEGRATION
Published in
Lua Nova: Revista de Cultura e Política, April 2020
DOI 10.1590/0102-269301/109
Authors

Victor Carneiro Corrêa Vieira

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 8 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 June 2020.
All research outputs
#5,539,252
of 25,760,414 outputs
Outputs from Lua Nova: Revista de Cultura e Política
#28
of 286 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#117,328
of 398,206 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Lua Nova: Revista de Cultura e Política
#3
of 4 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,760,414 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 78th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 286 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.0. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 398,206 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.