↓ Skip to main content

INACCESSIBLE RIGHT: PEOPLE WITH DISABILITIES AND ELECTIONS IN BRAZIL

Overview of attention for article published in Lua Nova: Revista de Cultura e Política, December 2023
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#31 of 285)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (73rd percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
INACCESSIBLE RIGHT: PEOPLE WITH DISABILITIES AND ELECTIONS IN BRAZIL
Published in
Lua Nova: Revista de Cultura e Política, December 2023
DOI 10.1590/0102-287323/120
Authors

Gustavo Martins Piccolo, Enicéia Gonçalves Mendes

Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 April 2024.
All research outputs
#6,679,421
of 25,634,695 outputs
Outputs from Lua Nova: Revista de Cultura e Política
#31
of 285 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#91,463
of 359,524 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Lua Nova: Revista de Cultura e Política
#1
of 3 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,634,695 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 73rd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 285 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.0. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 359,524 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them