You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Indigenous health care model: the case of the DSEI Xingu
|
---|---|
Published in |
Cadernos de Saúde Pública, January 2019
|
DOI | 10.1590/0102-311x00008119 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Sofia Beatriz Machado de Mendonça, Douglas Rodrigues, Pedro Paulo Gomes Pereira |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 16 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 16 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Master | 5 | 31% |
Professor | 3 | 19% |
Student > Bachelor | 2 | 13% |
Unknown | 6 | 38% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Nursing and Health Professions | 3 | 19% |
Medicine and Dentistry | 2 | 13% |
Environmental Science | 1 | 6% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 1 | 6% |
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 1 | 6% |
Other | 2 | 13% |
Unknown | 6 | 38% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 8. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 December 2020.
All research outputs
#4,372,533
of 25,385,509 outputs
Outputs from Cadernos de Saúde Pública
#157
of 1,854 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#92,305
of 446,429 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cadernos de Saúde Pública
#12
of 111 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,385,509 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 82nd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,854 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.2. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 446,429 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 111 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its contemporaries.